We had a good discussion on the peerage today. The biggest takeaway is we need more visibility. Something that we have been discussing already.
But something else occurred to me, as we had the discussion, we might want to consider not trying to push for a peerage for not just one specific weapon, but for being a master in one or more weapons. As a knight would be expected to be proficient in sword, polearm, spear etc. (aside from other qualifiers as deemed requisite)
Siege for instance only gets to field at the handful of events per year, or equestrian for example. Make sense? Thoughts?
